Ten years following the UK stumbled into a hasty referendum that split the nation and unleashed disorder, a advisory emerges from across the Irish Sea: it could happen again.
Policymakers and citizens drifted into Brexit and the identical could occur with a referendum on a unified Ireland, triggering convulsions for which nobody is equipped.
That represents the warning from two prominent writers from either side of the Irish border who have collaborated to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of Northern Ireland leaving the UK to form a fresh nation with the Republic of Ireland.
Governmental Establishments Ill-Equipped
The author and columnist and The Northern Ireland editor, have concluded that the political establishments in Ireland and Britain are woefully unprepared for a possibly fraught and transformative referendum.
"The key takeaway of Brexit hasn't been learned, which is that stuff can arise suddenly and can gather momentum very quickly," the commentator stated. "It is my view that the governmental framework of our archipelago remains highly fragile."
Book Publication Seeks to Provoke Discussion
The pair have examined the governmental, economic and cultural reasons for any structural alteration in a book, The Case For and Against Unification, released by the Irish Royal Irish Academy.
They aim to stir debate on the matter with a roadshow of lectures that will take them to Westminster early next month.
"What troubles everybody, or should haunt every person, is the Brexit vote of 2016," stated the analyst.
"We do not want a referendum on a thumbs up-thumbs down, unclear proposal whose consequences have remained undefined because then you find yourself with an extraordinarily split population where the losing side are resistant to defeat and the people who have won are uncertain exactly what it is that they have won."
Legal Framework
Under the Belfast Agreement, the Northern Ireland secretary of state should call a referendum on Irish unification if it is indicated that a most voters would vote in favour.
Nationalist parties and other nationalists say this point is imminent, and a organisation named pro-unification advocates has rallied support, but authorities in Dublin and London and unionists downplay the possibility, making it uncertain when or if there will be a referendum.
Lack of Informed Dialogue
Partisan language supporting and opposing unity has masked the absence of serious debate, said McBride.
"People tend to be for or against the notion but the concrete planning which might go beyond that to realise it is mostly absent. Much has gone on in academia but hardly any elected officials or campaigners are willing to participate with the essentials. To illustrate, what sort of state might be preferred? Centralised? Decentralised?"
Volume's Strategy
In the publication, none of the commentators endorses unity or the status quo. They composes two pieces that strive for objectivity in detailing the case for a unified Ireland and the argument against, marshalling financial and societal data, past examples and constitutional models.
Discussions cover flags and symbols, duties, medical care, retirement funds, sovereign debt obligations and the risk of unionist unrest. The objective is to inform and provoke conversation.
"Considerable attention exists in the topic but there hasn't quite been a discussion," stated the writer. "Discussion suggests an recognition of the idea that there could be good arguments on each side."
Dual Referendums
A public vote in Northern Ireland would also trigger one in the Republic of Ireland, where citizens report they favour unity but reject paying higher taxes or introducing a different emblem to reflect pro-UK communities' British culture.
"Authorities in Dublin should work out what the offer from pro-unification movements is other than just stating: 'We want a united Ireland and we love you'," stated O’Toole.
Likelihood of Referendum
The journalist believes a referendum in his lifetime is probable and that it may take place unexpectedly. "It is possible just a reckless or a bad or a incompetent government minister who declares: 'We should proceed and get it out of the way.'"
Both pro-unification advocates and unionists have plausible, valid arguments, he stated. "Somebody will prevail here and somebody will in the end not succeed but each side has has important lessons to learn from the alternative arguments."
Request for More Extensive Discussion
Westminster needed to join the discussion, said the analyst. "This is about Britain. It is a UK matter equally as it is an Irish question."